The other day at book club, Julie was talking about a viral video that shows a woman talking on a cell phone. In the 1920s! Someone found it in footage from a Charlie Chaplin movie premier. Proof of time travel!
We once read and liked The Time Traveler's Wife so this is a fascinating subject. It's fun to think what it would be like if you could go to another point in time. Like Marty McFly!
See if for yourself here:
I just couldn't stop looking at this. I just love the idea of someone traveling in time and getting caught on film.
BUT...
If you really look at the movie closely, it hard not to be distracted by the woman's shoes. U-G-L-Y, even for the time period, I would think. And so, if you were going to be a time traveler, and someday be seen around the world on a viral video, wouldn't you also make sure to have on at least slightly attractive footwear? Think about it, you would know.
Of course, in the book, the Time Traveler could not bring clothing, or objects with him. But in this case, if the woman was able to bring her iphone, wouldn't she be able to drag along some fashion items as well? It's not as if she's hiding here.
And who would she call?
I just don't know! But this brought to mind a photograph that people were talking about a while back, also called proof of time travel. Check out the dude in the sunglasses:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a6e4/4a6e44094cd64fede621ef02b035ab3d792f664e" alt=""
Makes you think.
I just know that I like looking at old photographs, so I did some googling, to find out what else was out there.
And sure enough, there are people, "photo historians," who do this kind of thing, and generate their own controversies among themselves.
The latest seems to be: what is the first known photograph with a person in it?
See this:
Last month at the excellent Krulwich Wonders blog, Robert Krulwich examined a set of astoundingly-sharp 1842 daguerreotypes of Cincinnati along the Ohio River. According to the University of Rochester, it's "the oldest photograph of an urban area in existence." Zooming way in, one could barely make out what appeared to be two people at the edge of the river, collecting what looked like a bucket of water. Inspired, one of Krulwich's readers did a bit of photo forensics and provided us a much better glimpse of those two folks. He blogged about his findings at Hokumburg Goombah. Krulwich followed up with another post and asks if this is the "first photo of a human being ever?"
And then some other guy magnified and sharpened a detail to show that it had people:
But the commonly accepted first known photograph of a person is this Daguerreotype from 1838:
I can totally see the guy with the shoe shine, but I had to look more closely to see the other people. I have magnified and sharpened the image to show you this detail. Do you see it?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd29b/bd29b1b59da4066fec29aa5ceb866f1904f311a8" alt=""